Quantum Dots For Drug Delivery Biology Essay

Quantum Dots For Drug Delivery Biology Essay A drug delivery system can be defined as the mechanism for the introduction of drug and other therapeutic agents into the body for treating any disease. An ideal drug delivery system possesses two elements: (1) the ability to target -to ensure high efficiency and reduce the side effects, (2) controlled drug release (3) prevention of side effects [8]. Using nanomaterials for drug delivery NDD (nanoparticle drug delivery) has the following advantages: reduced drug toxicity better penetration of the particles different delivery routes minimizes the irritant reactions improved bio-availability and increased circulation time controlled drug release and targeting It is one of the Green Technology methods as the focus is on minimizing the hazard side effects and maximizing the efficiency of any chemical (drug) of choice and replacing the existing products with new nanoparticles that are friendly throughout their lifecycle[8],[7]. QUANTUM DOTS FOR NDDS: NDDS means Nanoparticle Drug Delivery System. A system with high sensitivity, large resolution, and low cost is needed for the maintenance of drug delivery i.e. to check the nanocarrier distribution, drug release and degradation inside the body. Quantum Dots are highly suitable for such systems.[1] The important characteristics of Quantum dots which make them suitable for drug delivery systems are: small size, versatility of surface chemistry to incorporate various drugs, unique optical properties for real time monitoring of drug transport and release both at systemic and cellular levels. These Quantum Dots can be used as carriers by integrating with many drugs and also used as tags for other drug carriers. [6] WHY QUANTUM DOTS One of the important reasons why Quantum Dots are preferred is that it can be used for the traceable drug delivery as it has the potential to elucidate the pharmacokinetics (what the body does to the drug) and pharmacodynamics (what the drug does to the body) of drug when it is introduced into our body [6]. Using QDs will be a combination of unique physical, chemical, and optical properties which helps to study the interactions of these nanocarriers with biological systems through real-time monitoring and calculating the biodistribution of nanoparticle, drug release, intracellular uptake and degradation [5]. Comparing to the conventional imaging techniques like MRI and PET, the optical imaging using Quantum Dots is highly sensitive with high resolution and at very cheap cost which will automatically lead to the reduction of time involved in the development of new drug and many discoveries in the field [6]. ADVANTAGES OF USING QDs Optical imaging with high resolution, high sensitivity, multiplexing, and low cost Small size which leads to less amount of drug usage and low drug toxicity Versatile surface chemistry, Improved bioavailability and delivery of drug in a controlled and sustained manner Decreased incidence of side effects and improve patient compliance Comparing other conventional probes, QDs are more resistant which allows tracking cell processes for longer periods of time and which will lead to discovery of new molecular interactions Quantum dots have size dependant emission which can be modified according to our requirement (from UV to IR range) Fluorescence is seen for longer time when compared to conventional dyes. The extremely small size gives them great flexibility by allowing them using different delivery routes eg. they can be injected as liquid mixtures, fabrics, and polymer.[7] PROPERTIES OF QDs Some of the properties of Quantum Dots that are used to examine nanocarrier behavior in biological systems are: ([2], [5],[7]) Small size: size maybe around 2-10 nm in diameter that enables tagging of drug/carriers. Single or multi-component systems can be labeled for tracing and monitoring Surface chemistry: compatibility with various drug carriers integrating a wide range of nanoparticle drug carrier system. Emission profile: identifying quantum dots by its sharp narrow emission peak allows simultaneous observation of multiple nanocarriers within a same system. High brightness: detection of QDs inside body facilitates the tracing of nanocarriers in vivo. High photostability: QDs are more resistant to photobleaching that enables long term real time tracking. QUANTUM DOTS AS NANOCARRIERS Quantum Dots are considered as carriers and the therapeutic drug molecules are directly linked to them to be delivered to the target sites. Here it serves as both vehicle carrying the drug and tracing probe used for the real time monitoring. In drug delivery, size of the Quantum Dots is considered as a very important parameter. The size of QDs varies from 2 10 nm, and it increases to 5 20 nm in diameter after drug encapsulation. It should be noted that QDs of size smaller than 5 nm are removed in the process of renal filtration and those particles bigger is size have problems in penetrating through the tissues and many bigger particles are wiped out before they could reach their destination. Another important characteristics of QDs to be considered for drug delivery is the ratio of surface-to-volume. If this ratio is high then multiple carriers can be linked on single QDs without changing the average diameter of the nanocarrier system. Thus the ratio of surface-to-volume should be high. Fig.1 A Multifunctional Quantum Dot coated with Amphiphillic Polymer [6] The above figure illustrates that QD acts as core structural hydrophobic scaffold and the amphiphillic polymer is coated outside the core. The drug molecules which are hydrophobic in nature are embedded between the core and the polymer coating. And those hydrophilic therapeutic molecules can be incorporated on the amphiphillic coating. Multiple layers of ligands can be linked in subsequent layers not directly linked to the QD core but to the previous layers of coating and is controlled by them. These nanocarriers also protect the therapeutic molecule or proteins used from the bodys own immune system defense mechanism by encapsulating them within themselves. [6] Yamomoto et al did research on using quantum dots to treat stroke in and reported that the nanocarriers QD captopril conjugates were capable of lowering blood pressure in rats. But it was not known whether the therapeutic effect of lowering pressure was due to the conjugate or the detached drug from the quantum dots. [6]. Not only drugs, other therapeutic molecules like small interfering RNA, oligodeoxynucleotide and biomolecules e.g. antibodies, peptides can also be incorporated into the nanocarriers. siRNA delivery using quantum dots was reported by Bhatia et al. siRNA moleculeas were successfully delivered using targeted nanocarriers because of the size similarity between QDs and siRNA. Whereas larger molecules like plasmid will require many QDs for successful delivery. [6] Mn-doped ZnS Qds encapsulated with glycopolypeptide were fabricated for the drug delivery. Characterization and in vitro studies were done to prove the low cytotoxicity of the nanocarriers and it was good effort for the targeted drug delivery [4]. QUANTUM DOTS AS TAGS FOR OTHER DRUG CARRIERS Due to the unique properties of Quantum Dots, they are used as tags to label other drug carriers and are used as traceable drug delivery. The high photostability helps in the real time tracking of the nanocarrier inside the body. Therefore strong fluorescence signal indicates higher uptake of drug by the cells. The wavelength of the emitted signal depends on the size of the Quntum Dots used. Thus it is very specific to the QDs and thereby simultaneous nanocarriers can be used and the signals can be easily identified. Chen et al. reported about their work of siRNA delivery with QD conjugated with Lipofectamine. The results showed that fluorescence intensity of QD is proportional to the degree of silencing i.e. if lipoplex uptake is more than the fluorescence will be stronger. [6] Another work done by Zhang et al. reported the synthesis of QD-chitosan conjugate nanobeads for the delivery of siRNA. It was successfully traced because of the conjugation with QDs. [6] Amphipol nanocpmplex were prepared for the real time imaging of siRNA by Lifeng et al. it was delivered intracellularly and imaged in a real time pattern. [12] SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION There are many ways of preparing Quantum Dots. Some of the noted process of fabricating QDs are Lithography, Colloidal synthesis, Epitaxial methods, some chemical methods [2],[10]. Generally NDDS is prepared in the following steps: Nowadays many non-toxic semiconductor QDs are used for the drug delivery. Consider for example ZnO. It is a non-toxic semiconductor when compared to other Quantum Dots such as CdS, CdTe. These QDs can be combined with biocompatible and biodegradable polymer to increase the stability and non-immunogenicity of the nanocarriers. It also shields the nanocarriers from the interference of other interacting molecules inside biological environment. Chitosan is a natural copolymer which on encapsulation enhances the quantum dots properties like solubility in water, metal chelation and easy processing and biocompatibility [3]. Characterization studies like TEM, UV-VIS, PL spectroscopy, FTIR, Drug release response test are done after the synthesis. TEM is used to find out the size range of the fabricated QD. PL and PLE spectra give information about the emission spectra. FTIR confirms the incorporation of the drug into the QD and Drug release response test gives the amount of drug released and tells about the type of drug delivery. [10], [3]. CONCLUSION: Quantum Dots will be the future of drug delivery systems if the only drawback has been eliminated. The only disadvantage in using Quantum Dots is their long term toxicity. This can be overcome by replacing the core of the QD with biocompatible agents like gold or magnetic nanoparticles which offers a unique combination of therapy like magnetofection and photothermal treatment. Recent studies show that quantum dots to be safe on primates [9]. Quantum Dots will be a powerful tool to diagnose and treat cancer [11]. Thus quantum dots will become the new era of drug delivery.

The Effects of Drinking Behavior on College Students

The Effects of Drinking Behavior on College Students’ Academic Performance Abstract This study investigated the relationship between college students’ academic performance and their drinking behaviors. It was hypothesized that higher alcohol intake levels would be related to lower GPA. In the experiment, 28 Psychology students took an online survey which examined their level of alcohol intake in reference to their current grades. Current grades were measured by GPA and alcohol intake was based upon self-reported drinking frequency.Previous research supports the idea that poor academic performance is related to high alcohol intake. Background research supports the proposed hypothesis; however, the results found that alcohol intake had no significant relationship with academic performance. The Effects of Drinking Behavior on College Students’ Academic Performance One who attends a college or university will at some point engage in the consumption of alcohol. It can be viewed as the college life, which is becoming a major issue on campuses.This is an issue because it is our country’s responsibility to ensure that undergraduate studies encourage increase knowledge and not discourage it. The environment of school in general may be too relaxed and peer behavior and pressures contribute to behavior that may be detrimental to one’s college career. Undergraduate studies should be a gateway to even higher learning and not a hindrance. The growing concern about this issue can be gauged by the national new media coverage of heavy drinking.Recent developments in government, higher education, and the public health community have led to greater public awareness and policies to address the problem (Lewis, 2005). It has been found that students; who participated in binge drinking drank or had a hangover more than once a week and had lower grade point averages (Taylor, Johnson, Voas & Turrisi, 2006). In addition, it was noted that most students who did not enjoy learning or attending class; consumed alcohol at least once a month (Taylor, Johnson, Voas & Turrisi, 2006).Previous research has supported the hypothesis that higher alcohol intake is correlated with poor academic support. This study is unique because I wanted to see if this was true on a smaller scale. I decided to conduct a study at Old Dominion University using a sample of Psychology students. Though it has been found that poor academic performance is related to large alcohol consumption, I wanted to explore this finding on the campus of Old Dominion. Several studies have examined the effect of drinking behaviors and how they may be detrimental to college academic life.A national survey of nearly 37,000 students at 66 four-year institutions revealed a strong negative relationship between alcohol consumption and grades. Students with an A average consumed a little more than three drink per week, B students had almost five drinks, C students more than six, and D or F students reported nine drinks (Taylor, Johnson, Voas & Turrisi, 2006) Vaisman-Tzachor, R. , & Lai, J. (2008). According to the results of the research conducted, these students were unable to maintain higher GPAs because of the amount of regular alcohol consumption.In the current study, we explored the relationship between drinking behavior and academic performance. It was hypothesized that students who participated in drinking activities on a regular basis would not receive satisfactory grades. Participants were asked to complete an online survey that was administered via www. surveygizmo. com. Each participant was expected to answer truthfully to each question in order to determine the amount of alcohol usage in relation to their academic performance.In study conducted by Croom and colleagues, it was found that prior knowledge regarding alcohol was not found to have a significant effect on alcohol related behaviors. In this study the control group, college freshman, were giv en a survey and knowledge test during the summer prior to the start of college. The experimental group received the survey in addition to an online course, and final exam (Croom et al. , 2009). In another study, it was found that a positive correlation existed between personality and alcohol use.Personality characteristics that were considered included: openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. In addition, the study also found that there was a negative relationship between alcohol use and grade point average. As alcohol use increased the grade point averages of student’s decreased (Musgrave, Bromley, & Dalley, 1997). A study by Robert Crosnoe found that alcohol use increased with the failure of a course. Course failure was a greater predictor of alcohol use then was alcohol use a predictor of later course failure (Crosnoe, 2006). Method ParticipantsTwenty-seven Psychology students from Old Dominion University participated in this study. Participants were a warded extra credit for their participation. Materials A self-developed survey was used to study continuous drinking behavior and to monitor how much one drinks in comparison to his/her current academic achievement. The goal of the measure of the study was to determine the relationship between regular alcohol consumption and academic performance. The measure of the relationship was based upon the survey containing questions such as, â€Å"Have you ever had a hangover? † and â€Å"Do you enjoy learning? The survey was administered through online survey host website www. surveygizmo. com. The goal was to ask students indirectly about alcohol consumption in relation to their grades without telling them exactly what the survey was about. Alcohol intake was measured by the self-reported amount of drinks and drinking frequency. There were 19 questions altogether. Most questions were based upon a one to five scale, with one being the least in agreement and five being the most in ag reement. Some questions required yes or no responses and others had fill-in-the-blank options.Some of the ideas that I wanted the participants to explore were their true drinking behaviors, frequencies, and habits. I wanted to present the questions in such a way that the participant would voluntarily describe their habits without holding anything back. My overall goal was to observe through answers the amount of alcohol consumption in respect to grades. Asking about attitudes toward school and eventually progressing to actual grade representation, allowed me to compare alcohol usage to behavior toward school.Everything regarding school including but not limited to attitude toward it, grades while attending college, and immediate past test score should have either been parallel with consumption or negatively correlated. Procedure Each participant was responsible for taking a 19 question survey. The survey’s overall level of difficulty was easy. It did not require anyone to par ticipate longer than 5 minutes. They were asked a series of multiple choice and fill in the blank answers. Each participant was expected to answer truthfully. All 28 students were required to answer each question because it was mandatory.Before participation began everyone had to consent to participation, and afterward everyone was thanked and given extra credit by the participating professor. Results A Pearson’s Product-Moment correlation was used to determine the relationship between current grades (M = 3. 44) and drinking frequency (M = 3. 07). Results of this analysis showed that there was not a significant relationship between the two variables (r = . 11, p>05). Discussion The research conducted has verified the null hypothesis which concluded drinking does not have negative effect on academics.Most students who willingly participated in the survey responded that drinking at a high frequency or binged drinking did not adversely affect their grades. These findings are con trary to most acceptable research on alcohol being a negative correlate of academic failure. A survey was administered with questions requiring honesty about drinking habitats and academic performance. Questions were related directly to the topic and others were field questions. Mandatory questions were asked such as GPA and alcohol consumption on a monthly or daily basis. These key questions played a vital role in the outcome of the study.In the hypothesis it was proposed that drinking would have a negative effect on academics. In previous research, the correlation of drinking and class attendance had been shown to be to be within the realms of the stated hypothesis. When students consume alcohol it was related to negative academic performance. However, the outcome of the survey resulted in information that was quite opposite to the research conducted in the given survey. According to the survey used in the current study, there was no significant relationship between alcohol consum ption and acquired GPA.Most students who willingly participated in the survey responded that drinking at a high frequency or binge drinking did not adversely affect their grades. These findings are contrary to most acceptable research on alcohol being a negative correlate of academic failure. Previous research showed that students at four year collegiate universities are likely to consume alcohol. A national survey of 37,000 students at sixty-six four year institutions hypothesized that there would be a strong negative relationship between alcohol consumption and grades.In this study, students were asked to report drinking behaviors, and reported a significant amount of alcohol use. The study found that there was no significant relationship between alcohol use and grades (Jackson, 2006). This conclusion is similar to that of McAloon (1994), that higher levels of drinking were correlated with negative consequences, such as high rates of reported hangovers, driving under the influence , nausea or vomiting, suicide risk, and sexual assault. There was no significant relationship between drinking frequency and academic performance and one of the major confounds of this study was the sample itself.There were a plethora of issues surrounding the sample’s size and characteristics which could have led to results that turned out to be opposite of the hypothesis and previous background research studies that supported the hypothesis. There were only 28 participants in the study. There was not much diversity regarding the students’ demography. These 28 students were not randomly selected; rather, they were students working for the incentive of extra credit in the same class. It is very important to have diversity perspective in data because data can cover a wide variety of subjects.Diversity-centered research addresses different ethnicity, culture, sexuality, gender, age, disability, or a wide range of other perspectives (Lumby & Morrison, 2010). Information s uch as this would lead the average researcher to wonder if the results were skewed because of the lack of participation and the lack of diversity among the participants. Considering the idea that only observing one group of individuals (psychology majors) may distort results is enough to say that the results could have been different.Not having any participants outside of the major, with one exception, could lead one to believe that maybe Psychology students are just different. Maybe they are the exception to all of the previous background research. An assumption such as this could be considered a bit absurd, but there would be no way to assume anything contrary to this belief. The study did not include many others outside of the major. It would be safe to conclude that either Psychology students are the exception, or the researcher should have examined more students outside of the major to verify that this is no exception.Previous research suggests that alcohol and academia have a negative correlation. For example, college students who participated in the research study conducted by researchers in the Southwestern region of the United States found this statement and accurate depiction of the correlation between alcohol and academia. The study conducted found that most students who engaged in the consumption of alcohol had poor reflections when their grades were assessed and a high number engaged in drinking because of the collateral effects of having close people also engaging in this behavior. Hagman, Cohn, Noel, & Clifford, 2010). When there is a study performed that is disproving the above, it is important to make sure that there is no room for error or doubt. Examining only Psychology students and one Criminal Justice student was a large mistake. All but five of the participants were college seniors, and the remaining participants were fellow upperclassmen. Classification does not define level of maturation; however, it is possible that since the particip ants of this study were all upperclassmen they may be able to correctly conduct themselves in a manner that is not harmful to their everyday lives.Drinking frequency may have a larger effect on someone who is less mature about it and not willing to drink responsibly (Crosnoe, 2006). Lack of diversity among classification combined with participants’ ages being above the age of 21, contribute to the possibility that both may play a role in the idea that academic performance may not be in jeopardy due to alcohol intake after a certain point in life. Self-Report was also another major limitation of the study. As a researcher, no one should rely solely on the self-report of those participating in their study because level of accuracy is key.For instance, in the study done by a handful of researchers was conducted on the premises that students would be honest about their drinking habits when they enrolled in an alcohol awareness and preparation course. They discovered that most wer e not truthful and results were skewed and unreliable (Lewis, Marchell, Lesser, Reyna, & Kubicki-Bedford, 2009). One cannot assume that a person will not lie, forget, or make up what they need or want a researcher to believe. Unfortunately, the deception of the study was probably not enough to fool people into admitting exactly what their current rades were. Based upon previous research administered by Musgrave-Marquart, Bromley, and Daley (1997) it is unlikely to have â€Å"mostly A’s† and be intoxicated at least 3 times a week. The institution restriction and topic of discussion also served as confounds within the study. The use of only students from Old Dominion University from one specific classroom was a barrier to the results needed to prove the hypothesis. The topic of discussion can also be considered a sort of taboo. No one really wants to admit that they drink alcohol on a level that is not socially acceptable.Who really wants to say, â€Å"I’m an alc oholic. †? Not too many people are comfortable admitting that they are alcoholics to their selves, let alone complete strangers. At times, the topic can be difficult to speak about, and this could be a contribution to the results not being up to par with past research. Those who identified themselves as having a high tolerance for alcohol and abnormally frequent drinking behaviors still did not idenitfy themselves as alcoholics. These individuals skewed the survey and  showed that they could not  admit to what society thinks of as unacceptable (2003).Finally, the content of measure of the study made it more difficult to find results parallel to the hypothesis. One of the larger confounds of the study was gathering information through a self-reported survey only. My determinant was a 19 question survey with questions that were not of good quality. Some of the questions were too definitive and did not leave room for individuality. Sometimes it can be harder for a person to i dentify with such specific categories if there is room for another category that is not listed.Results become an issue when a question from the content of measure (the survey) is mandatory but does not necessarily fully apply to the participant. If a participant happens to fall in between two options such as drinking once a week or more than three times a week, but the option is not available, that person will be forced to answer to the best of their ability instead of with the whole truth. This person may drink twice a week but because that is not an option, they will report drinking more or less than they actually do according to the study offering skewed results.The study cannot fulfill its true objective because of the lack of quality within the questions. This source explains how social drinking can turn into a lifestyle and the longitudinal survey collected data on drinking from August 2004 through November 2007. The longitudinal survey data that was collected can cover a larg e amount of data versus short-term data (Fromme, Wertherill, & Neal, 2010). For future directions, I would suggest that anyone conducting a study that is related to the relationship between alcohol and academic performance use a study that is longitudinal for the desired results to prove such a hypothesis.Most of the background research on this particular study has been performed over long periods of time with many diverse groups. There should be a more diverse sample with people attempting to find accurate results about such a topic. Different forms of administration would most certainly help researchers with correct findings. Researchers could use interviews, assessments, or even an evaluation to gather information about Researchers must not restrict themselves to only one form of administration of their tests. There are other ways to gather personal information in an ethical manner.Instead of using a survey to cover all of the information, maybe researchers could use a questionna ire that screens alcohol usage only and then ask students to submit their grades. The questions that were asked were very vague and broad. For example, â€Å"What are your currents grades like? † could have been more useful if the options were more specific instead of â€Å"Mostly A’s† or â€Å"Mostly B’s†. A future researcher should focus on the questions’ style content and quality vs. quantity. I would also suggest that when conducting such a study in the future that there is a better measure of honesty.A researcher could find an ethical way to verify grades such as report cards or a transcript. There are many ways to verify concrete information such as current grades. Progress reports or past report cards (if applicable) can be considered verification of some of the answers provided in such a study. The benefit of using a progress report or a transcript to report concrete information is that there is no room for error report. It could als o increase the willingness to report truthful drinking behavior if the participant is not asked any questions about their personal performance and personal lifestyle simultaneously.The most important thing that should be considered if this study were to be repeated would be the content of measure. Accurate research results often require more than one content of measure. One cannot possibly know all there is to discover about a relationship between two factors if there is only one definitive determining factor. It would be beneficial for there to be more than one way to find out information. More specific questions and verified responses should be created for participants and researchers alike to ensure that the most accurate results are produced.In this study the relationship between alcohol intake and academic performance was measured by administration of a survey which asked about whether or not drinking habits had any significant behavior on academic performance. The survey asked questions about students’ typical drinking behavior and current and cumulative grades to define the relationship between the two. It was expected that we would find patterns for people who drink more to have lower grades, and the people who drank less were expected to have higher grades.The results found that there was no significant relationship between drinking frequency and academic performance. Previous research suggests that there is a strong negative relationship between the two. It appears that in this study we may have a false null hypothesis. The study did not find the desired results, but if performed correctly on another occasion, there should be no doubt that the results will support the hypothesis. It appears that colleges may have to implement harsher sanctions for students who cannot remain up to par academically.This may serve as motivation for these students not to attend college for the wrong reasons. Although the results of this particular study do not dem onstrate the idea that drinking alcohol has an adverse effect on academia, previous research suggests otherwise. Maybe if the atmosphere of college and the stereotype of college was not surrounded by the idea of alcohol, students would be more reluctant to pursue higher education without responsible attitudes. I would suggest that all universities place guidelines on the amount of partying for at least the first few years of students’ college careers.I would suggest that these colleges keep a close watch on the younger students specifically. Based upon the study, I would suggest that stricter guidelines be placed on college students who are not excelling in academics because of personal behavior. References Bingham, C. , Barretto, A. , Walton, M. , Bryant, C. , Shope, J. , & Raghunathan, T. (2010). Efficacy of a web-based, tailored, alcohol prevention/intervention program for college students: Initial findings. Journal of American College Health,  58(4), 349-356. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.Croom, K. , Lewis, D. , Marchell, T. , Lesser, M. , Reyna, V. , Kubicki-Bedford, L. , et al. (2009). Impact of an Online Alcohol Education Course on Behavior and Harm for Incoming first-Year College Students: Short-Term Evaluation of a Randomized Trial. Journal of American College Health,  57(4), 445-454. Retrieved from Psychology and Behavioral sciences Collection database. Crosnoe, R. (2006). The Connection Between Academic Failure and Adolescent Drinking in secondary School. Sociology of Education,  79(1), 44-60. Retrieved from Academic search Complete database. Fromme, K. Wetherill, R. R. , & Neal, D. J. (2010). Turning 21 and the Associated Changes in drinking and Driving after Drinking among College Students. Journal of American college Health, 59(1), 21-27. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Hagman, B. , Cohn, A. , Noel, N. , & Clifford, P. (2010). Collateral Informant Assessment in alcohol Use Research Involving College Students. Journal of American College health,  59(2), 82-90. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database. Jackson, K. M. , Sher, K. J. , & Park, A. (2006). Drinking among college students: consumption and consequences.In:  Galanter  M, ed. Recent Developments in Alcoholism: Research  on alcohol Problems in Adolescents and Young Adults. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2006;17:85-117. Lamis, D. , Ellis, J. , Chumney, F. , & Dula, C. (2009). Reasons for Living and Alcohol Use among College Students. Death Studies,  33(3), 277-286. doi:10. 1080/07481180802672017. Lewis, T. (2005). Readiness to Change, Social Norms, and Alcohol Involvement Among College students. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling,  26(1), 22-37. Retrieved from legal Collection database. Logan, D. , Kilmer, J. , & Marlatt, G. 2010). The Virtuous Drinker: Character Virtues as correlates and Moderators of College Student Drinking and Consequences. Journal of American College Health,  58(4), 317-324. Retrieved from Acade mic Search Complete database. Lumby, J. , & Morrison, M. (2010). Leadership and Diversity: Theory and Research. School Leadership & Management, 30(1), 3-17. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. McAloon, D. (1994). The effect of alcohol abuse on academic achievement on two-year campuses. Community College Review,  22(1), 12. Retrieved from Academic Search complete database. Musgrave-Marquart, D. Bromley, S. , & Dalley, M. (1997). Personality, Academic Attribution, and Substance Use as Predictors of Academic Achievement in College Students. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality,  12(2), 501-511. Retrieved from Academic Search complete database. NATIONAL SURVEY OF DRINKING AND DRIVING ATTITUDES ANDBEHAVIOURS, 2001. (2003). Chronicle of the American Driver & Traffic Safety Education Association, 7. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Osain, M. , & Alekseevic, V. (2010). The effect of alcohol use on academic performance of university students. Annals of General Psychiatry,  91. oi:10. 1186/1744-859X -9-S1-S215. Sullivan, M. , & Risler, E. (2002). Understanding College Alcohol Abuse and Academic performance: Selecting Appropriate Intervention Strategies. Journal of College counseling,  5(2), 114. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database. Taylor, D. , Johnson, M. , Voas, R. , & Turrisi, R. (2006). Demographic and Academic Trends in drinking Patterns and Alcohol-Related Problems on Dry College Campuses. Journal of alcohol & Drug Education,50(4), 35-54. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database. Vaisman-Tzachor, R. , & Lai, J. (2008).The Effects of College Tenure, Gender, and Social involvement on Alcohol Drinking and Alcoholism in College Students. Annals of the american Psychotherapy Association,  11(4), 18-24. Retrieved from Academic Search complete database. Welcome, M. , Pereverzeva, E. , & Pereverzev, V. (2010). A novel psychophysiological model of the effect of alcohol use on academic performance of male medical students of belarusian State Medical Univers ity. International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine & Public Health (IJCRIMPH),  2(6), 183-197. Retrieved from academic Search Complete database.

Business Plan Bar & Grill Essay

This is a business plan. It does not imply an offering of securities. 1.0 Executive Summary1 Chart: Highlights2 1.1 Objectives2 1.2 Mission2 1.3 Keys to Success2 2.0 Company Summary3 2.1 Company Ownership3 2.2 Start-up Summary4 Table: Start-up4 3.0 Products and Services5 4.0 Market Analysis Summary6 4.1 Market Segmentation6 Table: Market Analysis7 Chart: Market Analysis (Pie)7 4.2 Target Market Segment Strategy7 4.3 Service Business Analysis8 4.3.1 Competition and Buying Patterns9 5.0 Web Plan Summary9 5.1 Website Marketing Strategy9 5.2 Development Requirements9 6.0 Strategy and Implementation Summary9 6.1 SWOT Analysis10 6.1.1 Strengths10 6.1.2 Weaknesses10 6.1.3 Opportunities10 6.1.4 Threats10 6.2 Competitive Edge10 6.3 Marketing Strategy11 6.4 Sales Strategy11 6.4.1 Sales Forecast12 Table: Sales Forecast12 Chart: Sales Monthly13 Chart: Sales by Year13 6.5 Milestones14 Table: Milestones14 7.0 Management Summary14 7.1 Personnel Plan14 Table: Personnel15 8.0 Financial Plan15 8.1 Start-up Funding16 Table: Start-up Funding16 8.2 Important Assumptions17 8.3 Break-even Analysis17 Table: Break-even Analysis17 Chart: Break-even Analysis17 8.4 Projected Profit and Loss18 Table: Profit and Loss18 Chart: Profit Monthly19 Chart: Profit Yearly19 Chart: Gross Margin Monthly20 Chart: Gross Margin Yearly20 8.5 Projected Cash Flow21 Table: Cash Flow21 Chart: Cash22 8.6 Projected Balance Sheet23 Table: Balance Sheet23 8.7 Business Ratios25 Table: Ratios25 Table: Sales Forecast1 Table: Personnel1 Table: Profit and Loss2 Table: Cash Flow3 Table: Balance Sheet5 1.0 Executive Summary [Company Name] Contact: [Name] Direct Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX Address: [Address] [City, State ZIP] Email: [Email Address] Introduction The long-term goal of [Company Name] is to serve quality food, have outstanding customer service and run and maintain a cost efficient base without sacrificing quality. [Company Name]serves high quality food and beverages in an inviting and friendly atmosphere at reasonable prices. [Company Name] is expanding its exposure through effective marketing as well as introducing the area to market segments that have not yet discovered the Company. Location [Company Name]is headquartered in Dwight, North Dakota which is located in Dickey County. The [Company Name] will be located on the site of the original [Company Name], which was built in 1961. This location is a landmark that sets on Highway 1 and 11 along the James River. The [Company Name] is nested nicely near the South Dakota border between Ellendale and Oakes, ND. The Company [Company Name]is a steakhouse concept which will offer a comfortable, friendly atmosphere. The Company’s owner is [Name], who established the restaurant as a Limited Liability Corporation. [Name] has 15 years of industry experience as a bartender and 8 years of experience as a cook. [Company Name] will be open 5 days per week. Serving dinner Tuesday-Wednesday from 5:00 pm to 10:00 pm; on Thursday – Saturday dinner served from 5:00 pm to 11:00 pm. Furthermore, the restaurant will be open one (1) Sunday a month on trial basis. Lunch will be served from 11:00 am to 2:00 pm. The restaurant will also be set-up as an all you can eat buffet style restaurant. Our Services [Company Name]’s menu will feature char broiled steaks, chicken, shrimp, burgers and a variety of basket foods along with occasional weekend specials of prime rib and barbecued ribs. Beverages will include various beers, cocktails and non-alcoholic beverages. The Market [Company Name] will focus on local residents and anyone passing by who wants to enjoy a good meal in a comfortable, friendly, down home atmosphere. [Company Name]’s market segmentation scheme is fairly straightforward and focuses on the target market, Dickey County, North Dakota residents. These customers prefer certain services and quality of food and it’s the Company’s duty to deliver on their expectations. Financial Considerations The current financial plan for [Company Name] is to obtain grant funding in the amount of $350,000. The grant will be used to get acquisition of the property, contents and rights to the business. Chart: Highlights [pic] 1.1 Objectives [Company Name]has three main objectives: †¢ To serve quality food. †¢ To have outstanding customer service. †¢ To run and maintain a cost efficient base without sacrificing quality. 1.2 Mission [Company Name]’s mission is to serve high quality food and beverages in an inviting and friendly atmosphere at reasonable prices. 1.3 Keys to Success [Company Name]’s keys to success are location, quality service and delicious food. 2.0 Company Summary [Company Name]is headquartered in Dwight, North Dakota Contact: [Name] Direct Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX Address: [Address] [City, State ZIP] Email: [Email Address] The [Company Name] is located in Dwight, North Dakota, which is one mile west of the city Ludden in Dickey County. The Company is a start-up restaurant, owned by [Name], who has 15 years of industry experience as a bartender and 8 years of experience as a cook. Additionally, [Name] has 10 years of experience as an Administrative Assistant. [Company Name]is a steakhouse concept which will offer a comfortable, friendly atmosphere. The menu will feature char broiled steaks, chicken, shrimp, burgers and a variety of basket foods along with occasional weekend specials of prime rib and barbecued ribs. Beverages will include various beers, cocktails and non-alcoholic beverages. The [Company Name] will be located on the site of the original [Company Name], which was built in 1961. This location is a landmark that sets on Highway 1 and 11 along the James River. The [Company Name] is nested nicely near the South Dakota border between Ellendale and Oakes, ND. [Company Name]will be open 5 days per week. Serving dinner Tuesday-Wednesday from 5:00 pm to 10:00 pm; on Thursday – Saturday dinner served from 5:00 pm to 11:00 pm. Furthermore, the restaurant will be open one (1) Sunday a month on trial basis. Lunch will be served from 11:00 am to 2:00 pm. The restaurant will also be set-up as an all you can eat buffet style restaurant. [Company Name]will be closed on New Year’s Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. The lounge will be open Tuesday – Saturday from 5:00 pm to 1:00 am. The rest of business structure has not been identified as of date. There will be an attorney and accountant determined at a later date. 2.1 Company Ownership [Company Name]is a Limited Liability Corporation. The owner of the start-up restaurant is [Name], who has 100% ownership of the business. 2.2 Start-up Summary The following table and chart shows the start-up costs for [Company Name], LLC Table: Start-up |Start-up | | | | | |Requirements | | | | | |Start-up Expenses | | |Software (Cost/Inventory Control) |$500 | |Liquor/Food License (State/County) |$1,800 | |Inspections |$1,000 | |Supplies |$2,500 | |Utilities Deposit |$1,500 | |Legal & Accounting fees |$5,000 | |Propane Tank & 1st Fill |$3,000 | |Total Start-up Expenses |$15,300 | | | | |Start-up Assets | | |Cash Required |$0 | |Start-up Inventory |$26,000 | |Other Current Assets |$30,950 | |Long-term Assets |$329,800 | |Total Assets |$386,750 | | | | |Total Requirements |$402,050 | Chart: Start-up [pic] 3.0 Products and Services [Company Name]is a comfortable, inviting restaurant designed to make its customers feel at home. The dining side has a sizzling 48†³ gas powered grill and char boiler which will make all steaks to perfection. [Company Name] Menu: The following meals come with the customer’s choice of potato, baked, hash brown or fries. Meals also include a trip to the full salad bar! All steaks are hand cut daily and charbroiled to perfection. Steaks Choice Sirloin 10 oz †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $13.75 House Sirloin 8 oz †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $12.50 Petite Sirloin 6 oz †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $9.75 Beef Tips-grilled or hand dipped in batter-deep fried†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $12.50 Rib eye 12 oz†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. $16.25 Rib eye 10 oz †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $14.75 Steak and Shrimp 6 oz sirloin steak with three deep fried shrimp †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $15.50 Seafood Walleye dipped in batter and deep fried †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $15.75 4 Jumbo shrimp served with tater sauce or red sauce†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. $13.50 Cod (Torsk)†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $11.50 Chicken  ¼ pc dinner†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $11.50  ½ pc dinner†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $13.50 Baskets All baskets served with fries or onion rings. Burgers are  ½ lb handmade served on toasted bun. Hamburger basket †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $7.50 Cheese burger basket†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. $7.75 Burger basket served w/cheese, lettuce, onion, tomato†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $8.50 Chicken Strip (4 pc) basket †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $8.75 Chicken Drummies (6) basket †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $8.75 Breaded Tip basket †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $9.25 Appetizer Platter Chicken drummies, Onion rings, Cheese sticks, Mushrooms, Mini Egg Rolls. Served with Ranch Dressing†¦.†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $15.25 Beverages Coffee †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $1.00 Tea †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $1.00 Soda†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. $1.50 Milk†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $1.50 4.0 Market Analysis Summary The U.S. restaurant industry, which consist of fast food, casual dining and upscale chains, is facing its toughest stretch in three decades. This is due to declining guest traffic, declining average check, and a decline in sales. To survive, restaurant operators will need to balance incentives and discounts with added value and brand enhancement. Steak restaurants comprise less than 5% of the total restaurant market. Service oriented steak houses have room to grow. Meat and potatoes are still what Americans want, and they want it with good service. [Company Name]will focus on local residents and anyone passing by who wants to enjoy a good meal in a comfortable, friendly, down home atmosphere. [Company Name] intends to cater to a wide group of people. The Company wants everyone to feel welcome and relaxed in a friendly atmosphere with a large menu selection. It is its goal to have the â€Å"most tender, tastiest steaks† in the area. [Company Name]has the services necessary to flourish within this industry. By delivering superior customer service, offering affordable prices and developing an outstanding reputation, [Company Name]’s potential is excellent. 4.1 Market Segmentation Individuals going out to spend good money on meals or beverages want a variety of items to choose from. Additionally, these individuals want to dine at an establishment with consistent business hours. [Company Name]will be more than willing to offer that to all customers who walk into the business. The Company wants to create an environment that is fun, friendly and comfortable with prices that are very competitive. Customers are the first priority. [Company Name]’s market segmentation scheme is fairly straightforward and focuses on the target market, Dickey County, North Dakota residents. These customers prefer certain services and quality of food and its Company’s duty to deliver on their expectations. The information contained in the market analysis table, displays [Company Name]’s main markets. All of [Company Name]’s clients will benefit from its delicious food, atmosphere and exceptional customer service. Table: Market Analysis |Market Analysis | | | | | | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |Sales | | | | |Food |$259,480 |$275,049 |$291,552 | |Dining Beverage |$14,400 |$15,264 |$16,180 | |Bar Beverage |$30,928 |$32,784 |$34,751 | |Total Sales |$304,808 |$323,096 |$342,482 | | | | | | |Direct Cost of Sales | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |Food |$90,800 |$96,248 |$102,023 | |Dining Beverage |$1,440 |$1,526 |$1,618 | |Bar Beverage |$9,588 |$10,163 |$10,773 | |Subtotal Direct Cost of Sales |$101,828 |$107,938 |$114,414 | Chart: Sales Monthly [pic] Chart: Sales by Year [pic] 6.5 Milestones In order to achieve the growth and marketing goals that have been outline in this business plan, [Company Name]has deadlines to meet and ideas to implement. Some of these are outlined below: 1. Obtain grant funding in the amount of $350,000 to improve business 2. Acquisition of the property, contents and rights to the business Table: Milestones |Milestones | | | | | | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |Owner/Manager |$33,600 |$34,272 |$34,957 | |Head Cook |$16,800 |$17,136 |$17,479 | |Asst. Cook |$7,776 |$7,932 |$8,090 | |Head Waiter |$12,180 |$12,424 |$12,672 | |Waiters |$13,080 |$13,342 |$13,608 | |Bartenders |$8,352 |$8,519 |$8,689 | |Dishwashers |$6,264 |$6,389 |$6,517 | |Total People |14 |14 |14 | | | | | | |Total Payroll |$98,052 |$100,013 |$102,013 | 8.0 Financial Plan The current financial plan for [Company Name]is to obtain grant funding in the amount of $350,000. The grant will be used to get acquisition of the property, contents and rights to the business. The following sections of this plan will serve to describe [Company Name]’s financial plan in more detail: †¢ General Assumptions †¢ Break-even Analysis †¢ Profit and Loss †¢ Cash Flow †¢ Balance 8.1 Start-up Funding [Company Name]’s start-up costs are detailed in the Start-up Table. The following table shows how these start-up costs will be funded. Table: Start-up Funding |Start-up Funding | | |Start-up Expenses to Fund |$15,300 | |Start-up Assets to Fund |$386,750 | |Total Funding Required |$402,050 | | | | |Assets | | |Non-cash Assets from Start-up |$386,750 | |Cash Requirements from Start-up |$0 | |Additional Cash Raised |$0 | |Cash Balance on Starting Date |$0 | |Total Assets |$386,750 | | | | | | | |Liabilities and Capital | | | | | |Liabilities | | |Current Borrowing |$0 | |Long-term Liabilities |$0 | |Accounts Payable (Outstanding Bills) |$0 | |Other Current Liabilities (interest-free) |$0 | |Total Liabilities |$0 | | | | |Capital | | | | | |Planned Investment | | |Owner |$10,000 | |Outside Financing |$350,000 | |Additional Investment Requirement |$42,050 | |Total Planned Investment |$402,050 | | | | |Loss at Start-up (Start-up Expenses) |($15,300) | |Total Capital |$386,750 | | | | | | | |Total Capital and Liabilities |$386,750 | | | | |Total Funding |$402,050 | 8.2 Important Assumptions The table below presents the assumptions used in the financial calculations of this business plan. The average percent variable cost is estimated to be 33%. The estimated monthly fixed cost is $13,705. 8.3 Break-even Analysis For the break-even analysis, the monthly revenue needed to break-even is $20,581. The break-even analysis has been calculated on the â€Å"burn rate† of the Company. [Company Name]feels that this gives the investor a more accurate picture of the actual risk of the venture. Table: Break-even Analysis |Break-even Analysis | | | | | |Monthly Revenue Break-even |$20,581 | | | | |Assumptions: | | |Average Percent Variable Cost |33% | |Estimated Monthly Fixed Cost |$13,705 | Chart: Break-even Analysis [pic] 8.4 Projected Profit and Loss [Company Name]’s Pro Forma Profit and Loss statement was constructed from a conservative point-of-view, and is based in large part on past performance. The income for Year 1, Year 2 and Year 3 are $304,808, $323,096 and $342,482, respectively. The net profit for the same period is $26,961, $36,035 and $42,838, respectively. The percentages of the net profit sales for this period were 8.85%, 11.15% and 12.51%, respectively. Once the Company receives grant funding to add the new assets, the depreciation of the building will be over a 20 year period, while the equipment will be depreciated over a 7 year period. Table: Profit and Loss |Pro Forma Profit and Loss | | | | | | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |Sales |$304,808 |$323,096 |$342,482 | |Direct Cost of Sales |$101,828 |$107,938 |$114,414 | |Other Costs of Sales |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Total Cost of Sales |$101,828 |$107,938 |$114,414 | | | | | | |Gross Margin |$202,980 |$215,159 |$228,068 | |Gross Margin % |66.59% |66.59% |66.59% | | | | | | |Expenses | | | | |Payroll |$98,052 |$100,013 |$102,013 | |Marketing/Promotion |$6,250 |$6,438 |$6,631 | |Depreciation |$12,045 |$13,143 |$13,143 | |Supplies |$600 |$618 |$637 | |Utilities |$8,400 |$8,652 |$8,912 | |Insurance |$5,004 |$5,004 |$5,004 | |Maintenance |$1,200 |$1,236 |$1,273 | |Office Expense |$1,800 |$1,854 |$1,910 | |Payroll Taxes |$9,805 |$10,001 |$10,201 | |Phone/TV/Internet |$1,800 |$1,854 |$1,910 | |Propane |$12,000 |$12,360 |$12,731 | |Property Tax |$2,508 |$2,508 |$2,508 | |Acct & Legal |$5,000 |$0 |$0 | | | | | | |Total Operating Expenses |$164,464 |$163,681 |$166,871 | | | | | | |Profit Before Interest and Taxes |$38,516 |$51,478 |$61,197 | |EBITDA |$50,561 |$64,621 |$74,340 | | Interest Expense |$0 |$0 |$0 | | Taxes Incurred |$11,555 |$15,443 |$18,359 | | | | | | |Net Profit |$26,961 |$36,035 |$42,838 | |Net Profit/Sales |8.85% |11.15% |12.51% | Chart: Profit Monthly [pic] Chart: Profit Yearly [pic] Chart: Gross Margin Monthly [pic] Chart: Gross Margin Yearly [pic] 8.5 Projected Cash Flow [Company Name] is a start-up Company that has applied for a grant of $350,000. The Company forecasts that it will receive funding in the month of October. During this period, the Company will get acquisition of the property, contents and rights to the business. The following table displays [Company Name]’s cash flow, and the chart illustrates monthly cash flow in the first year. Monthly cash flow projections are also included in the appendix. Table: Cash Flow |Pro Forma Cash Flow | | | | | | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |Cash Received | | | | | | | | | |Cash from Operations | | | | |Cash Sales |$304,808 |$323,096 |$342,482 | |Subtotal Cash from Operations |$304,808 |$323,096 |$342,482 | | | | | | |Additional Cash Received | | | | |Sales Tax, VAT, HST/GST Received |$0 |$0 |$0 | |New Current Borrowing |$0 |$0 |$0 | |New Other Liabilities (interest-free) |$0 |$0 |$0 | |New Long-term Liabilities |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Sales of Other Current Assets |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Sales of Long-term Assets |$0 |$0 |$0 | |New Investment Received |$350,000 |$0 |$0 | |Subtotal Cash Received |$654,808 |$323,096 |$342,482 | | | | | | |Expenditures | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | | | | | | |Expenditures from Operations | | | | |Cash Spending |$98,052 |$100,013 |$102,013 | |Bill Payments |$136,504 |$176,166 |$184,277 | |Subtotal Spent on Operations |$234,556 |$276,179 |$286,291 | | | | | | |Additional Cash Spent | | | | |Sales Tax, VAT, HST/GST Paid Out |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Principal Repayment of Current Borrowing |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Other Liabilities Principal Repayment |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Long-term Liabilities Principal Repayment |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Purchase Other Current Assets |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Purchase Long-term Assets |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Dividends |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Subtotal Cash Spent |$234,556 |$276,179 |$286,291 | | | | | | |Net Cash Flow |$420,252 |$46,917 |$56,192 | |Cash Balance |$420,252 |$467,170 |$523,361 | Chart: Cash [pic] 8.6 Projected Balance Sheet [Company Name]’s net worth is $763,711, $799,746 and $842,583, for Year 1, Year 2 and Year 3, respectively. Table: Balance Sheet |Pro Forma Balance Sheet | | | | | | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |Assets | | | | | | | | | |Current Assets | | | | |Cash |$420,252 |$467,170 |$523,361 | |Inventory |$10,924 |$11,342 |$12,023 | |Other Current Assets |$30,950 |$30,950 |$30,950 | |Total Current Assets |$462,126 |$509,462 |$566,334 | | | | | | |Long-term Assets | | | | |Long-term Assets |$329,800 |$329,800 |$329,800 | |Accumulated Depreciation |$12,045 |$25,188 |$38,331 | |Total Long-term Assets |$317,755 |$304,612 |$291,469 | |Total Assets |$779,881 |$814,074 |$857,803 | | | | | | Table: Balance Sheet (Continued) |Liabilities and Capital | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | | | | | | |Current Liabilities | | | | |Accounts Payable |$16,170 |$14,328 |$15,219 | |Current Borrowing |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Other Current Liabilities |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Subtotal Current Liabilities |$16,170 |$14,328 |$15,219 | | | | | | |Long-term Liabilities |$0 |$0 |$0 | |Total Liabilities |$16,170 |$14,328 |$15,219 | | | | | | |Paid-in Capital |$752,050 |$752,050 |$752,050 | |Retained Earnings |($15,300) |$11,661 |$47,696 | |Earnings |$26,961 |$36,035 |$42,838 | |Total Capital |$763,711 |$799,746 |$842,583 | |Total Liabilities and Capital |$779,881 |$814,074 |$857,803 | | | | | | |Net Worth |$763,711 |$799,746 |$842,583 | 8.7 Business Ratios The table below presents ratios from the full-service restaurant markets as a reference. Table: Ratios |Ratio Analysis | | | | | | | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |Industry Profile | |Sales Growth |n.a. |6.00% |6.00% |1.65% | | | | | | | |Percent of Total Assets | | | | | |Inventory |1.40% |1.39% |1.40% |6.34% | |Other Current Assets |3.97% |3.80% |3.61% |43.25% | |Total Current Assets |59.26% |62.58% |66.02% |53.12% | |Long-term Assets |40.74% |37.42% |33.98% |46.88% | |Total Assets |100.00% |100.00% |100.00% |100.00% | | | | | | | |Current Liabilities |2.07% |1.76% |1.77% |25.40% | |Long-term Liabilities |0.00% |0.00% |0.00% |73.91% | |Total Liabilities |2.07% |1.76% |1.77% |99.31% | |Net Worth |97.93% |98.24% |98.23% |0.69% | | | | | | | |Percent of Sales | | | | | |Sales |100.00% |100.00% |100.00% |100.00% | |Gross Margin |66.59% |66.59% |66.59% |58.06% | |Selling, General & Administrative Expenses |57.75% |55.44% |54.08% |23.02% | |Advertising Expenses |2.05% |1.99% |1.94% |1.74% | |Profit Before Interest and Taxes |12.64% |15.93% |17.87% |6.52% | | | | | | | |Main Ratios | | | | | |Current |28.58 |35.56 |37.21 |1.25 | |Quick |27.90 |34.77 |36.42 |1.00 | |Total Debt to Total Assets |2.07% |1.76% |1.77% |99.31% | |Pre-tax Return on Net Worth |5.04% |6.44% |7.26% |4325.19% | |Pre-tax Return on Assets |4.94% |6.32% |7.13% |29.65% | | | | | | | Table: Ratios (Continued) |Additional Ratios | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | | |Net Profit Margin |8.85% |11.15% |12.51% |n.a | |Return on Equity |3.53% |4.51% |5.08% |n.a | | | | | | | |Activity Ratios | | | | | |Inventory Turnover |10.09 |9.70 |9.79 |n.a | |Accounts Payable Turnover |9.44 |12.17 |12.17 |n.a | |Payment Days |27 |32 |29 |n.a | |Total Asset Turnover |0.39 |0.40 |0.40 |n.a | | | | | | | |Debt Ratios | | | | | |Debt to Net Worth |0.02 |0.02 |0.02 |n.a | |Current Lab. to Liab. |1.00 |1.00 |1.00 |n.a | | | | | | | |Liquidity Ratios | | | | | |Net Working Capital |$445,956 |$495,134 |$551,114 |n.a | |Interest Coverage |0.00 |0.00 |0.00 |n.a | | | | | | | |Additional Ratios | | | | | |Assets to Sales |2.56 |2.52 |2.50 |n.a | |Current Debt/Total Assets |2% |2% |2% |n.a | |Acid Test |27.90 |34.77 |36.42 |n.a | |Sales/Net Worth |0.40 |0.40 |0.41 |n.a | |Dividend Payout | 0.00 |0.00 |0.00 |n.a | Table: Sales Forecast Sales Forecast Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12SalesFood$19,346 $19,733 $20,128 $20,531 $20,942 $21,361 $21,788 $22,224 $22,668 $23,121 $23,583 $24,055 Dining Beverage$1,000 $1,102 $1,124 $1,146 $1,169 $1,192 $1,216 $1,240 $1,265 $1,290 $1,316 $1,340 Bar Beverage$2,306 $2,352 $2,399 $2,447 $2,496 $2,546 $2,597 $2,649 $2,702 $2,756 $2,811 $2,867 Total Sales$22,652 $23,187 $23,651 $24,124 $24,607 $25,099 $25,601 $26,113 $26,635 $27,167 $27,710 $28,262 Direct Cost of Sales Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12Food$5,705 $5,990 $6,290 $6,604 $6,934 $7,281 $7,645 $8,027 $8,428 $8,849 $9,291 $9,756 Dining Beverage$102 $105 $108 $111 $114 $117 $121 $125 $129 $133 $136 $139 Bar Beverage$602 $639 $664 $697 $732 $769 $807 $847 $889 $933 $980 $1,029 Subtotal Direct Cost of Sales$6,409 $6,734 $7,062 $7,412 $7,780 $8,167 $8,573 $8,999 $9,446 $9,915 $10,407 $10,924  Table: Personnel Personnel Plan Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12Owner/Manager$2,800 $2,800 $2,800 $2,800 $2,800 $2,800 $2,800 $2,800 $2,800 $2,800 $2,800 $2,800 Head Cook$1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 Asst. Cook$648 $648 $648 $648 $648 $648 $648 $648 $648 $648 $648 $648 Head Waiter$1,015 $1,015 $1,015 $1,015 $1,015 $1,015 $1,015 $1,015 $1,015 $1,015 $1,015 $1,015 Waiters$1,090 $1,090 $1,090 $1,090 $1,090 $1,090 $1,090 $1,090 $1,090 $1,090 $1,090 $1,090 Bartenders$696 $696 $696 $696 $696 $696 $696 $696 $696 $696 $696 $696 Dishwashers$522 $522 $522 $522 $522 $522 $522 $522 $522 $522 $522 $522 Total People14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Total Payroll$8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171  Table: Profit and Loss Pro Forma Profit and Loss Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12Sales$22,652 $23,187 $23,651 $24,124 $24,607 $25,099 $25,601 $26,113 $26,635 $27,167 $27,710 $28,262 Direct Cost of Sales$6,409 $6,734 $7,062 $7,412 $7,780 $8,167 $8,573 $8,999 $9,446 $9,915 $10,407 $10,924 Other Costs of Sales$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Cost of Sales$6,409 $6,734 $7,062 $7,412 $7,780 $8,167 $8,573 $8,999 $9,446 $9,915 $10,407 $10,924 Gross Margin$16,243 $16,453 $16,589 $16,712 $16,827 $16,932 $17,028 $17,114 $17,189 $17,252 $17,303 $17,338 Gross Margin %71.71% 70.96% 70.14% 69.28% 68.38% 67.46% 66.51% 65.54% 64.54% 63.50% 62.44% 61.35% ExpensesPayroll$8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 Market ing/Promotion$750 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 Depreciation$0 $1,095 $1,095 $1,095 $1,095 $1,095 $1,095 $1,095 $1,095 $1,095 $1,095 $1,095 Supplies$50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 Utilities$700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 Insurance$417 $417 $417 $417 $417 $417 $417 $417 $417 $417 $417 $417 Maintenance$100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 Office Expense$150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 Payroll Taxes10% $817 $817 $817 $817 $817 $817 $817 $817 $817 $817 $817 $817 Phone/TV/Internet$150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 Propane$1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 Property Tax$209 $209 $209 $209 $209 $209 $209 $209 $209 $209 $209 $209 Acct & Lega l$5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Operating Expenses$17,514 $13,359 $13,359 $13,359 $13,359 $13,359 $13,359 $13,359 $13,359 $13,359 $13,359 $13,359 Profit Before Interest and Taxes($1,271)$3,094 $3,230 $3,353 $3,468 $3,573 $3,669 $3,755 $3,830 $3,893 $3,944 $3,979 EBITDA($1,271)$4,189 $4,325 $4,448 $4,563 $4,668 $4,764 $4,850 $4,925 $4,988 $5,039 $5,074  Interest Expense$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0  Taxes Incurred($381)$928 $969 $1,006 $1,040 $1,072 $1,101 $1,126 $1,149 $1,168 $1,183 $1,194 Net Profit($890)$2,166 $2,261 $2,347 $2,428 $2,501 $2,568 $2,628 $2,681 $2,725 $2,761 $2,785 Net Profit/Sales-3.93% 9.34% 9.56% 9.73% 9.87% 9.96% 10.03% 10.07% 10.07% 10.03% 9.96% 9.86% Table: Cash Flow Pro Forma Cash Flow Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12Cash ReceivedCash from OperationsCash Sales$22,652 $23,187 $23,651 $24,124 $24,607 $25,099 $25,601 $26,113 $26,635 $27,167 $27,710 $28,262 Subtotal Cash from Operations$22,652 $23,187 $23,651 $24,124 $24,607 $25,099 $25,601 $26,113 $26,635 $27,167 $27,710 $28,262 Additional Cash ReceivedSales Tax, VAT, HST/GST Received0.00% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 New Current Borrowing$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 New Other Liabilities (interest-free)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 New Long-term Liabilities$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales of Other Current Assets$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sales of Long-term Assets$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 New Investment Received$350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Cash Received$372,652 $23,187 $23,651 $24,124 $24,607 $25,099 $25,601 $26,113 $26,635 $27,167 $27,710 $28,262 Table: Cash Flow (Continued) Expenditures Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12Expenditures from OperationsCash Spending$8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 $8,171 Bill Payments$299 $8,830 $5,065 $6,547 $12,875 $13,296 $13,734 $14,188 $14,661 $15,152 $15,663 $16,194 Subtotal Spent on Operations$8,470 $17,001 $13,236 $14,718 $21,046 $21,467 $21,905 $22,359 $22,832 $23,323 $23,834 $24,365 Additional Cash SpentSales Tax, VAT, HST/GST Paid Out$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Principal Repayment of Current Borrowing$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Liabilities Principal Repayment$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Long-term Liabilities Principal Repayment$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Purchase Other Current Assets$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Purchase Long-term Assets$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Dividends$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Cash Spent$8,470 $17,001 $13,236 $14,718 $21,046 $21,467 $21,905 $22,359 $22,832 $23,323 $23,834 $24,365 Net Cash Flow$364,182 $6,186 $10,415 $9,406 $3,561 $3,632 $3,696 $3,754 $3,803 $3,844 $3,876 $3,897 Cash Balance$364,182 $370,368 $380,783 $390,189 $393,750 $397,382 $401,078 $404,832 $408,635 $412,479 $416,355 $420,252 Table: Balance Sheet Pro Forma Balance Sheet Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12AssetsStarting BalancesCurrent AssetsCash$0 $364,182 $370,368 $380,783 $390,189 $393,750 $397,382 $401,078 $404,832 $408,635 $412,479 $416,355 $420,252 Inventory$26,000 $19,591 $12,857 $7,062 $7,412 $7,780 $8,167 $8,573 $8,999 $9,446 $9,915 $10,407 $10,924 Other Current Assets$30,950 $30,950 $30,950 $30,950 $30,950 $30,950 $30,950 $30,950 $30,950 $30,950 $30,950 $30,950 $30,950 Total Current Assets$56,950 $414,723 $414,175 $418,795 $428,551 $432,480 $436,499 $440,601 $444,781 $449,031 $453,344 $457,712 $462,126 Long-term AssetsLong-term Assets$329,800 $329,800 $329,800 $329,800 $329,800 $329,800 $329,800 $329,800 $329,800 $329,800 $329,800 $329,800 $329,800 Accumulated Depreciati on$0 $0 $1,095 $2,190 $3,285 $4,380 $5,475 $6,570 $7,665 $8,760 $9,855 $10,950 $12,045 Total Long-term Assets$329,800 $329,800 $328,705 $327,610 $326,515 $325,420 $324,325 $323,230 $322,135 $321,040 $319,945 $318,850 $317,755 Total Assets$386,750 $744,523 $742,880 $746,405 $755,066 $757,900 $760,824 $763,831 $766,916 $770,071 $773,289 $776,562 $779,881 Table: Balance Sheet (Continued) Liabilities and Capital Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12Current LiabilitiesAccounts Payable$0 $8,663 $4,854 $6,118 $12,432 $12,839 $13,262 $13,700 $14,156 $14,631 $15,123 $15,636 $16,170 Current Borrowing$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Current Liabilities$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Current Liabilities$0 $8,663 $4,854 $6,118 $12,432 $12,839 $13,262 $13,700 $14,156 $14,631 $15,123 $15,636 $16,170 Long-term Liabilities$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Liabilities$0 $8,663 $4,854 $6,118 $12,432 $12,839 $13,262 $13,700 $14,156 $14,631 $15,123 $15,636 $16,170 Paid-in Capital$402,050 $752,050 $752,050 $752,050 $752,050 $752,050 $752,050 $752,050 $752,050 $752,050 $752,050 $752,050 $752,050 Retained Earning s($15,300)($15,300)($15,300)($15,300)($15,300)($15,300)($15,300)($15,300)($15,300)($15,300)($15,300)($15,300)($15,300)Earnings$0 ($890)$1,276 $3,537 $5,884 $8,311 $10,812 $13,381 $16,009 $18,690 $21,415 $24,176 $26,961 Total Capital$386,750 $735,860 $738,026 $740,287 $742,634 $745,061 $747,562 $750,131 $752,759 $755,440 $758,165 $760,926 $763,711 Total Liabilities and Capital$386,750 $744,523 $742,880 $746,405 $755,066 $757,900 $760,824 $763,831 $766,916 $770,071 $773,289 $776,562 $779,881 Net Worth$386,750 $735,860 $738,026 $740,287 $742,634 $745,061 $747,562 $750,131 $752,759 $755,440 $758,165 $760,926 $763,711  INFORMATION AND FORMS ARE PROVIDED â€Å"AS IS† WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY OF ANY KIND INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, NONINFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL DOCSTOC, INC., OR ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS , ATTORNEYS, ETC., BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS OF INFORMATION) ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE MATERIALS, EVEN IF DOCSTOC HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. They are for guidance and should be modified by you or your attorney to meet your specific needs and the laws of your state or jurisdiction. Use at your own risk. Docstoc ® is NOT providing legal or any other kind of advice and is not creating or entering into an  Attorney-Client relationship. The information, reports, and forms are not a substitute for the advice of your own attorney. The law is a personal matter and no general information or forms or like the kind Docstoc provides can always correctly fit every circumstance. Note: Carefully read and follow the Instructions and Comments contained in this document for your customization to suit your specific circumstances and requirements. You will want to delete the Instructions and Comments from open bracket (â€Å"[â€Å") to close bracket (â€Å"]†) after reading and following them. You (or your attorney) may want to make additional modifications to meet your specific needs and the laws of your state. The Instructions and Comments are not a substitute for the advice of your own attorney. ââ€"Å  Where within this document you see this symbol: ââ€"Å  or an instruction states â€Å"Insert any number you chooseââ€"Å ,† or something similar, or there is a blank for the user to complete, please note that although Docstoc believes the information or number may be any that the user chooses, and that there is no law governing what the information or number should be, you might want to verify this, including by consulting with your own attorney practicing in your state. Because the law is different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and the laws are subject to change, Docstoc cannot guarantee—and disclaims all guarantees—that it is correct for the information or number to be anything that the user chooses. The information, forms, instructions, tips, comments, decision tree alternatives and choices, reports, and services in and through Docstoc are not legal advice, but are general information / forms on general issues often encountered designed to help Docstoc users, members, purchasers, and subscribers address their own needs. But information, including tips, general forms, instructions, comments, decision tree alternatives and choices, and reports, no matter how seemingly customized to conform to the laws and regulations applicable to you, is not the same as legal advice, which may be the specific application of laws and regulations by lawyers licensed to practice law in your state to the specific circumstances and needs of individuals and entities. Some states, counties, municipalities,  and other governmental divisions, have highly specific laws and regulations, and our information / forms / reports may not take all those specific laws and regulations into consideration, although we tried to do so. Docstoc is not a law firm and the employees and contractors (including attorneys, if any) of Docstoc are not acting as your attorneys, and none of them are a substitute for the advice of your own attorney licensed to practice law in your state. The employees or contractors of Docstoc, who wrote or modified any form, instructions, tips, comments, decision tree alternatives and choices, and reports, are NOT providing legal or any other kind of advice and are not creating or entering into an Attorney-Client relationship. Any such form, instruction, tips, comments, decision tree alternatives and choices, and reports were most likely NOT prepared or reviewed by an attorney licensed to practice law in your state, and, therefore, the employees or contractors could not provide you with legal advice even if they or Docstoc wanted to. Even though we take every reasonable effort to attempt to make sure our information / forms / reports are accurate, up to-date, and useful, we recommend that you consult a lawyer licensed to practice law in your state if you want professional assurance that our information, forms, instructions, tips, comments, decision tree alternatives and choices, and reports; your interpretation of it or them; and the information and input that you provide are appropriate to your particular situation. Application of these general principles and wording to particular circumstances should be done by a lawyer who has consulted with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles and general wording, you might want to hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains. The information, forms, instructions, tips, comments, decision tree alternatives and choices, and reports, available on and through Docstoc are not legal advice and are not guaranteed to be correct, complete, accurate, or up-to-date. Because the law is different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, they are subject to changes, and there are varying interpretations and applications by different courts and governmental and administrative bodies, and Docstoc cannot guarantee—and disclaims all guarantees—that the information, forms, and reports on or  through the site and services are completely current or accurate. Please further note that laws change and are regularly amended; therefore, the provisions, names, and section numbers of statutes, codes, or regulations, and the types of permits or licenses within any forms or reports, may not be 100% correct, as they may be partially or wholly out of date and some relevant ones may have been omitted or misinterpreted. Docstoc is not permitted to engage in the practice of law. Docstoc is prohibited from providing any kind of advice, explanation, opinion, or recommendation to a consumer about possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection, or completion of forms or strategies. Communications between you and Docstoc may be protected by our Privacy Policy (http://premium.docstoc.com/privacypolicy), but are NOT protected by the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine since Docstoc is not a law firm and is not providing legal advice. No Docstoc employee, contractor, or attorney is authorized to provide you with any advice about what information (again, which includes forms) to use or how to use or complete it or them. Entire document copyright  © Docstoc ®, Inc., 2010 – 2013 All Right ReservedINFORMATION AND FORMS ARE PROVIDED â€Å"AS IS† WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY OF ANY KIND INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, NONINFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL DOCSTOC, INC., OR ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS, ATTORNEYS, ETC., BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS OF INFORMATION) ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE MATERIALS, EVEN IF DOCSTOC HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. They are for guidance and should be modified by you or your attorney to meet your specific needs and the laws of your state or jurisdiction. Use at your own risk. Docstoc ® is NOT providing legal or any other kind of advice and is not creating or entering into an Attorney-Client relationship. The information, reports, and forms are not a substitute for the advice of your own attorney. The law is a personal matter and no general information or forms or like the kind Docstoc provides can always correctly fit every circumstance. Note: Carefully read and follow the Instructions and Comments contained in this document for your customization to suit your specific circumstances and requirements. You will want to delete the Instructions and Comments from open bracket (â€Å"[â€Å") to close bracket (â€Å"]†) after reading and following them. You (or your attorney) may want to make additional modifications to meet your specific needs and the laws of your state. The Instructions and Comments are not a substitute for the advice of your own attorney. ââ€"Å  Where within this document you see this symbol: ââ€"Å  or an instruction states â€Å"Insert any number you chooseââ€"Å ,† or something similar, or there is a blank for the user to complete, please note that although Docstoc believes the information or number may be any that the user chooses, and that there is no law governing what the information or number should be, you might want to verify this, including by consulting with your own attorney practicing in your state. Because the law is different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and the laws are subject to change, Docstoc cannot guarantee—and disclaims all guarantees—that it is correct for the information or number to be anything that the user chooses. The information, forms, instructions, tips, comments, decision tree alternatives and choices, reports, and services in and through Docstoc are not legal advice, but are general information / forms on general issues often encountered designed to help Docstoc users, members, purchasers, and subscribers address their own needs. But information, including tips, general forms, instructions, comments, decision tree alternatives and choices, and reports, no matter how seemingly customized to conform to the laws and regulations applicable to you, is not the same as legal advice, which may be the specific application of laws and regulations by lawyers licensed to practice law in your state to the specific circumstances and needs of individuals and entities. Some states, counties, municipalities, and other governmental divisions, have highly specific laws and regulations, and our information / forms / reports may not take all those specific laws and regulations into consideration, although we tried to do so. Docstoc is not a law firm and the employees and contractors (including  attorneys, if any) of Docstoc are not acting as your attorneys, and none of them are a substitute for the advice of your own attorney licensed to practice law in your state. The employees or contractors of Docstoc, who wrote or modified any form, instructions, tips, comments, decision tree alternatives and choices, and reports, are NOT providing legal or any other kind of advice and are not creating or entering into an Attorney-Client relationship. Any such form, instruction, tips, comments, decision tree alternatives and choices, and reports were most likely NOT prepared or reviewed by an attorney licensed to practice law in your state, and, therefore, the employees or contractors could not provide you with legal advice even if they or Docstoc wanted to. Even though we take every reasonable effort to attempt to make sure our information / forms / reports are accurate, up to-date, and useful, we recommend that you consult a lawyer licensed to practice law in your state if you want professional assurance that our information, forms, instructions, tips, comments, decision tree alternatives and choices, and reports; your interpretation of it or them; and the information and input that you provide are appropriate to your particular situation. Application of these general principles and wording to particular circumstances should be done by a lawyer who has consulted with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles and general wording, you might want to hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains. The information, forms, instructions, tips, comments, decision tree alternatives and choices, and reports, available on and through Docstoc are not legal advice and are not guaranteed to be correct, complete, accurate, or up-to-date. Because the law is different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, they are subject to changes, and there are varying interpretations and applications by different courts and governmental and administrative bodies, and Docstoc cannot guarantee—and disclaims all guarantees—that the information, forms, and reports on or through the site and services are completely current or accurate. Please further note that laws change and are regularly amended; therefore, the provisions, names, and section numbers of statutes, codes, or regulations, and the types of permits or licenses within any forms or reports, may not be 100% correct, as they may be partially or wholly out of date and some  relevant ones may have been omitted or misinterpreted. Docstoc is not permitted to engage in the practice of law. Docstoc is prohibited from providing any kind of advice, explanation, opinion, or recommendation to a consumer about possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection, or completion of forms or strategies. Communications between you and Docstoc may be protected by our Privacy Policy (http://premium.docstoc.com/privacypolicy), but are NOT protected by the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine since Docstoc is not a law firm and is not providing legal advice. No Docstoc employee, contractor, or attorney is authorized to provide you with any advice abo ut what information (again, which includes forms) to use or how to use or complete it or them. Entire document copyright  © Docstoc ®, Inc., 2010 – 2013 All Right Reserved ———————– Business Plan for Restaurant Bar and Grill This Business Plan for a Bar and Grill Restaurant allows entrepreneurs or business owners to create a comprehensive and professional business plan. This template form allows a business to outline the company’s objectives and detail both current company information as well as any past performance. Companies should include a complete market analysis in their plan to help showcase why their business strategy will be effective in the market. Future company plans, including production targets, management strategy, and financial forecasting, should be used to demonstrate and confirm that the company’s short-term and long-term objective can and will be met. This model plan can be customized to best fit the unique needs of any entrepreneur or owner that is seeking to create a strong business plan. Business Plan for Restaurant Bar and Grill This Business Plan for a Bar and Grill Restaurant allows entrepreneurs or business owners to create a comprehensive and professional business plan. This template form allows a business to outline the company?s objectives and detail both curren[pic][?]

The Final Cultural Factor Involved With Education Essay

The final cultural factor involved with education in Japan is the essential part of education in Japan that involves the strengthening of the moral values of students. Passing down important moral values to children is the job of the school and parents (Whitburn, 1995), and one notable value that is portrayed in every Japanese school is the ability to cooperate with others well and efficiently. With this idea of a â€Å"group identity,† there is less of an emphasis on the individual, but more on the whole, which, according to Whitburn (1995), also helps contribute to â€Å"order and discipline not only in society but also in the classroom.† Again, the dependence on each other is included in schools, and since there is so much dependence on each other, the need for good cooperation increases. Along with this Japanese concept of a group identity lies many expectations held for the students in many of the school rules common to most, if not all, schools in Japan. According to Koda (personal interview, October 16, 2016), an exchange student from Japan, students are expected to wear their hair and required uniforms in certain ways and not to violate certain rules; many schools also require students to join clubs, or extracurricular activities, which are fun ways to get along well with other students and foster good relationships with certain faculty members. While Japan’s overall education system seems to be simple and effective, it is not without its flaws, and people not used toShow MoreRelatedTypes Of Internal And External Influences820 Words   |  4 PagesBehavior is hard to change due to having different factors effect. A person, maybe change the behavior because of one factor, and also maybe keep no change even influence all factors. To clarify all factors in detail, there are two components: internal and external influences. Starting of an internal factor which is personal, which a person change behavior only because of own mind without affect by any external factors. Example of age, different age group like baby boomers, generation X and generationRead Morecase num 1 hardley dav Essay819 Words   |  4 PagesThe decision of which partner to choose to help the company change the way it purchased raised fundamental tensions within the company†. Question 1 Consider Exhibit 10 on page 22 of the case; does it include the factors you consider most important in the selection process? Which factors would you be inclined to weight most heavily? I think Harley Davidson did a very good job selecting the evaluation criteria. From the functional criteria, I consider Receiving, Supply Management and Project TrackingRead MoreHarley Davidson: Software Selection Process992 Words   |  4 PagesThe decision of which partner to choose to help the company change the way it purchased raised fundamental tensions within the company†. Question 1 Consider Exhibit 10 on page 22 of the case; does it include the factors you consider most important in the selection process? Which factors would you be inclined to weight most heavily? I think Harley Davidson did a very good job selecting the evaluation criteria. From the functional criteria, I consider Receiving, Supply Management and Project TrackingRead MorePhysical Examination And Management For Patients With Multiple Comorbidities And Medication Management910 Words   |  4 Pages Took part in the history, physical examination and management for the patient. Involved in the discussion regarding health maintenance and education. Learned about management patients with multiple comorbidities and medication management. Participated by observing common outpatient procedures. Actively involved in continues learning by discussing topics with the attending. 12 wk, Observership. My rotation involved inpatient rounding in the ICU and Subacute nursing home in O’Connor hospital andRead MoreCommunity Conceptual Model1282 Words   |  6 Pagesthe center. Social elements within this model are individual, relationships, community, and societal. This model takes into account the multifaceted interaction between individual, relationship, community, and societal factors. The social ecological model divides factors into four systems: micro system, mesosystem, exosystem, and macrosystem and describe influences as intercultural, community, organizational, and interpersonal. The mesosystem is the first level connecting structures of aRead MoreThe Self-Determination Theory by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan1720 Words   |  7 PagesThe motivation of different individuals can vary for many reasons, two of those reasons can be internal and external factors. The internal factors are referred to as intrinsic motivators and the external factors are signified as extrinsic motivators. The Self-Determination Theory developed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan is constructed on the basis of three distinctive psychological essentials, which include competence, relatedness, and autonomy (self-determination) (Moneta, 2004, p. 181). In orderRead MoreHow Social Class Affect Children s Interactions With Authority Figures? Essay881 Words   |  4 PagesIntroduction Social class is a defining characteristic of all people. It is a multidimensional descriptor with factors that hold relative to the economic, social, political, and cultural resources of society. The resources used to gain advantages in society are called cultural capital. In this manner then, does social class affect how children are raised? Does social class also affect children’s interactions with authority figures? In Annette Lareau’s study â€Å"Invisible Inequality: Social Class andRead MoreThe Final Body Of Literature1674 Words   |  7 PagesThe final body of literature I want to give notice to is the literature pertaining to how museums are arranged by curators and other museum staff to effectively display their artifacts. I wish to dive into this literature because part of my own research will be examining how the curators of the Cleveland Museum of Art decided to arrange their ancient Greek exhibit. This pool of literature will help guide me in different w ays to interpret the set-up of the exhibit, the placement of the objects andRead MoreHigh Tower Trail Middle School Essay1275 Words   |  6 Pagesthe strengths of High Tower Trail had were that it was always changing, it was challenging, and gave its students equal opportunities. Some areas where it could improve would be to encourage more parent involvement, encourage teachers to be more involved, and have more teamwork between the students and teachers. I believe that in this case the strengths out-weigh the areas that need improvement, but no school is perfect, and in order to be a successful middle school, it must keep changing in orderRead MoreEssay about The Modern Canadian Family1690 Words   |  7 Pagescentury. The definition of family has changed, along with the functions of families. Many modern families have veered from what we once considered the tradition family. This essay will discuss the different types of newly developed families, and some factors contributing t o this change. Same-sex couples are increasing among families. In 2001, the definition of census family was changed to incorporate same-sex couples whom live in a common-law relationship. If previous statistics before 2006 did not